Disclaimer: This book was sent to me by the publisher, Blackstone Publishing, for an honest review.
Genre: Mystery
Plot: After their mother passes, three estranged siblings reunite to sort out her estate.
Beth, the oldest, never left home. She stayed with her mom, caring for her until the very end.
Nicole, the middle child, has been kept at arm’s length due to her ongoing battle with a serious drug addiction.
Michael, the youngest, lives out of state and hasn’t been back to their small Wisconsin town since their father ran out on them seven years before.
While going through their parent’s belongings, the siblings stumble upon a collection of home videos and decide to revisit those happier memories. However, the nostalgia is cut short when one of the VHS tapes reveals a night back in 1999 that none of them have any recollection of. On screen, their father appears covered in blood. What follows is a dead body and a pact between their parents to get rid of it, before the video abruptly ends. Beth, Nicole, and Michael must now decide whether to leave the past in the past or uncover the dark secret their mother took to her grave.
Opinion:
I was really excited to start this book when I came across it for a number of reasons, the first being that it was categorized as a horror. But woe is me, because THIS book?! THIS book right here??
NOT horror.
For shame!
I requested this story because I loved the concept of three kids finding a home video where their parents are hiding a dead body. I mean, come on. That is GOLD. Just imagine the trauma, anxiety and recalculating of one’s childhood that would ensue from there! And though this isn’t by any means a horrible story, it just wasn’t that great for me.
In high school I took a creative writing class and the main thing my teacher drilled into us is this: avoid cliche and simile sentences like the plague. It makes a talented author look uncreative and lazy, and it makes the reader have a harder time connecting to and believing the story and characters.
Jeneva Rose, loves cliches and similes.
“Death waits for no one.”
“Because when death calls, you answer.”
“Time stops when death makes a visit.”
“…there are no shortcuts in life.”
“But then again, grief is like an airport. There are no rules or social norms. You just do what you gotta do to pass the time until you reach your next destination.”
“It’s the not knowing that kills me. A mixture of hope and grief is toxic, like combining ammonia and bleach. On their own, you can stand it at least for a little while, but together, it’s deadly.”
And then there were countless moments where the author was trying to philosophize things that the reader didn’t need to focus on. And instead of me reading a line and going “wow, that’s so deep and creative” I found myself wondering what the hell she was going on about.
“I think that people dislike something for one of two reasons: we truly dislike it, or we dislike it because it gives us an opportunity to value something else more. And when you don’t have much in life, there isn’t much you’re able to detest before you run out of things to, well, detest. So, Beth chose crust. Michael chose this town. And I chose myself.”
She’s comparing how disliking something on a pizza is a metaphor for life.
Pizza.
Life.
Anyways, that’s only littering the first half so the second half gets better.
And by better, I mean it starts moving along and getting to the point.
The ending is a little underwhelming with how everything ties together. I didn’t feel a huge sense of shock when everything was revealed, though some things turned out differently than I expected. I liked the “chain reaction” style it took, but I just felt like I was being thrown through a series of events rather than feeling what was happening to the characters.
For a book that is heavy on the grief, I didn’t feel sad for any of these people. I didn’t like them or care about what happened to them, because they all felt two-dimensional. They would say horrible things to one another and mope about how hard their lives have been. They all fall into a never-ending display victim mentality which makes it feel like one big narcissistic show. Then when it came to mystery of their father’s disappearance, I was really excited to see where the author would take it. Though it is a shocking thing to think about happening in real life, it didn’t come across as a big reveal in the book. I wish I could say I gasped and scoffed as things relieved themselves, but I just found myself speeding through the pages to get to the end.
Well shit.
I really didn’t plan on ripping this book apart when I started this review, because I really don’t hate it. I just don’t find it very impressive.
It’s a story.
That’s all I really have to say.
I’m giving three stars because two feels hurtful, and I’m sure Jeneva put a lot of hard work and love into writing this. It’s just not for me.